Feature Requests & Ideas

in our company QA is a shared responsability of the developers and QA.That means that the developers are allowed to adapt failing Mabl tests. But there is no "easy" way to find out what another user changed in a test. Nowadays you can do this by= ...

When creating tests I typically create more steps then necessary but later find I needed that step for my test to work properly. This more evident with recording hovers. I find that a deleted the wrong one. If I could comment out the step, then I ...

As a QA engineer, I would like to have the ability to bulk change the failure reason of multiple test results. There are times when network issues cause - for example - dozens of tests to fail. Currently, I have to go inside each and every test re...

Similar to the current integration with Slack, I'd ask that Mabl also integrates with Teams, Microsoft's business communication application. Many company's who are heavily integrated into the Microsoft technology stack like ours are now moving to ...

As a QA engineer, I want to batch update label of set/group of tests so that it will be easier to update test cases instead of labelling them one by one

Hi, we use Slack integration the see test results of all our Mabl test plans which are used in CI/CD process and also run regularly based on a schedule. In October this integration stopped working and does not send notifications about changed stat...

Currently, Mabl sessions expire at certain times. Logging in each time is time-consuming, so we would like the session time to be longer or to be able to set a longer time.

As a test author, I want the option of variables used in a flow to be passed to it as parameters, so that I can use the same flow with different input multiple times without having to declare/mutate the input variables in a previous steps (and pol...

As QA Engineer, I want to be able to select and use a data table on Ad-hoc execution, so that the data variables will be used are based on the data table I have created rather than the default values.

As a test author, I want the option to enclose a set of steps/flows in a 'for' loop iterating over provided array of values or numeric range, so that I have a single source of truth for the repeated logic (therefore one place to make changes).