Feature Requests & Ideas

As a mabl user, I would like the ability to export the plan/ test execution results so that I can easily get the list of variables and values for each test in the plan and not have me go into each test run history manually and "view" the variables.

The trainer today records Click and Hold+click action. The request is to add feature for the trainer to record action Cmd+Click (on Mac)/ Ctrl+click(Windows) to open a new tab.

The Test section allows user to mark checkboxes against every test, but only has these 3 capabilities - Add to Plan Delete and Download CSV.The request is to also have a feature for Run. I would like to checkbox multiple tests and run them adhoc w...

Regarding the Test Results, there's not really a way to differentiate results based on who kicked off a test. We find this to be a necessary feature because:There might be scenarios where 2 engineers are running the same test as part of verifying ...

It would be great if user can see the test name in the Mabl Trainer. We have bunch of similar tests and when updating few of them in the row it's really easy to get confused what test user currently works with.

As a QA Engineer, I want to be able to pass a data table id when running a test via the cli, so that the test running will use the correct test data needed for the test.Current Situation: Most of our tests are using flows but each test have to use...

When trained steps are not self explanatory, step notes are very helpful! They would be even more helpful if you could tell they exist or not :)A short use case (based on a mostly true story)QA#2 attempts to edit a test that QA#1 wrote. QA#2 is co...

When we're notified in Slack that a mabl test step detected JS errors in the cloud, it would be helpful ifa) You could navigate directly to the specific test step log from the notification in slack-or-b) Navigate directly to the specific test step...

To help assuring the quality of the tests that are created or modified in the AGILE mindset, the branch merging system should have a review process. QA team could have a reviewer status and be required to analyse the changes before they are merged...

I have one test that is currently set up to run against three different environments (QA, UAT, Production)When this test runs I would like the results to be posted in different slack channels based on the environment it is run in. So post the resu...